Navbar
    About Contact Complete List of All Posts Blog Roll Posts PAGES Settings THME
THME
Blog PW
  • About
    Home About Bennett Blog Roll Posts: Complete List Posts: By Month Bennett Incidents
  • Research
    Investigations Investors
    Library Utlitites
    Information Technology Failures Energy Infrastructure Contractors
  • Agencies
    Federal State Local International
  • Government
    Committees Executive House & Senate International Litigation & Courts
  • Utilities
    Companies Utilities & Industries
menu-primary-container
>
PG&E Witness

Office of the Whistleblower

Pete BennettJanuary 06, 2022Whistleblower No comments

Office of the Whistleblower

Frequently Asked Questions

The answers to these frequently asked questions represent the views of the staff of the Office of the Whistleblower. They are not rules, regulations or statements of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Further, the Commission has neither approved nor disapproved them. These FAQs provide short general summaries of certain key features of the SEC Whistleblower Program and do not purport to be a complete or comprehensive discussion of all of its provisions. For detailed information about the program, including eligibility requirements and certain limitations that apply, please see Section 922 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and the Amended Rules implementing the program.

On June 28, 2018, the SEC voted to propose several amendments to the rules governing the whistleblower program. The proposed amendments were published in the Federal Register on July 20, 2018 and were open for public comment thru September 18, 2018.

On September 23, 2020, the SEC voted to adopt amendments to the rules governing its whistleblower program that are designed to provide greater clarity to whistleblowers and increase the program’s efficiency and transparency. These rule amendments are now effective as of December 7, 2020. Please review the guidance to determine the impact the amendments have on the rules that may apply to your situation. 


  1. What is the SEC Whistleblower Program?
  2. Who is an eligible whistleblower?
  3. What information can I submit to the SEC?
  4. What does it mean to “voluntarily” provide information? 
  5. What is “original information?” 
  6. How might my information “lead to” a successful SEC action?
  7. I work at a company with an internal compliance process. Can I report internally and still be eligible for a whistleblower award?
  8. I provided information to the SEC before the enactment of Dodd-Frank on July 21, 2010. Am I eligible for an award? 
  9. How do I submit information under the SEC whistleblower program?
  10. Can I submit my information anonymously? 
  11. Will the SEC keep my identity confidential?
  12. What happens to my tip once it's received by the SEC?
  13. How will I learn about the opportunity to apply for an award?
  14. How do I apply for an award?
  15. How can I apply for an award in connection with a related action?
  16. What factors does the SEC consider in determining the amount of the award?
  17. Can I appeal the SEC's award decision?
  18. What rights do I have if my employer retaliates against me for reporting a possible securities violation?
  19. If I have more questions who can I call?

1. What is the SEC Whistleblower Program?

The Whistleblower Program was created by Congress to provide monetary incentives for individuals to come forward and report possible violations of the federal securities laws to the SEC. Under the program eligible whistleblowers (defined below) are entitled to an award of between 10% and 30% of the monetary sanctions collected in actions brought by the SEC and related actions brought by certain other regulatory and law enforcement authorities.

The Program also prohibits retaliation by employers against employees who provide us with information about possible securities violations.


2. Who is an eligible whistleblower?

An “eligible whistleblower” is a person who voluntarily provides the SEC with original information about a possible violation of the federal securities laws that has occurred, is ongoing, or is about to occur. The information provided must lead to a successful SEC action resulting in an order of monetary sanctions exceeding $1 million. One or more people are allowed to act as a whistleblower, but companies or organizations cannot qualify as whistleblowers. You are not required to be an employee of the company to submit information about that company. See Rule 21F-2. In addition, to be eligible for an award, the information must be provided in the form and manner required under the whistleblower rules.  See Rule 21F-9 and FAQ 9.


3. What information can I submit to the SEC?

The SEC conducts investigations into possible violations of the federal securities laws. In general, the more specific, credible, and timely a whistleblower tip, the more likely it is that the tip will be forwarded to investigative staff for further follow-up or investigation. For instance, if the tip identifies individuals involved in the scheme, provides examples of particular fraudulent transactions, or points to non-public materials evidencing the fraud, the tip is more likely to be assigned to Enforcement staff for investigation.

The SEC does not have jurisdiction to take action on information that is outside the scope or coverage of the federal securities laws. We may, in appropriate circumstances, refer your matter to another regulatory or law enforcement agency.

If you would like to provide the SEC with information about fraud or wrongdoing involving potential violations of the federal securities laws please follow the instructions provided in Rule 21F-9 and FAQ 9. Some examples of the kind of conduct the SEC is interested in include:

  • Ponzi scheme, Pyramid scheme, or a High-Yield Investment Program
  • Theft or misappropriation of funds or securities
  • Manipulation of a security's price or volume
  • Insider trading
  • Fraudulent or unregistered securities offering
  • False or misleading statements about a company (including false or misleading SEC reports or financial statements)
  • Abusive naked short selling
  • Bribery of, or improper payments to, foreign officials
  • Fraudulent conduct associated with municipal securities transactions or public pension plans
  • Initial Coin Offerings and Cryptocurrencies 
  • Other fraudulent conduct involving securities

4. What does it mean to “voluntarily” provide information? 

Your information is provided “voluntarily” if you provide it to us or another regulatory or law enforcement authority before a request, inquiry, or demand that relates to same subject matter is directed to you or anyone representing you (such as an attorney) by (i) the Commission, (ii) another regulatory or law enforcement agency or self-regulatory organization (such as FINRA), or (iii) Congress or any other authority of the federal government. See Rule 21F-4(a).


5. What is “original information?” 

“Original information” is information derived from your independent knowledge (facts known to you that are not derived from publicly available sources) or independent analysis (evaluation of information that may be publicly available but which reveals information that is not generally known) that is not already known by us. So if we received your information previously from another person, that information will not be original information unless you were the original source of the information that the other person submitted. See Rule 21F-4(b)(1). Some information is excluded from the definition of “original information, such as information subject to the attorney-client privilege or information learned because you held certain titles at a company (such as an officer or director) and you learned the information from another person or through the entity’s internal reporting systems.  See Rule 21F-4(b)(4).

In September 2020, the SEC adopted interpretive guidance on the meaning of “independent analysis.”  See Rule Amendment FAQ 5.
 


6. How might my information “lead to” a successful SEC action?

Your information satisfies the “led to” criterion if your information causes us to open a new investigation, re-open a previously closed investigation or pursue a new line of inquiry in connection with an ongoing investigation, and we bring a successful enforcement action based at least in part on the information you provided. Additionally, you may still be eligible if your information relates to an ongoing examination or investigation, if the information you provide significantly contributes to the success of our resulting enforcement action. You may also be eligible if you report your information internally first to your company, and the company later reports your information to us, or reports the results of an internal investigation that was prompted by your information, as long as you also report directly to us within 120 days. See Rule 21F-4(c).


7. I work at a company with an internal compliance process. Can I report internally and still be eligible for a whistleblower award?

You may report internally at your company, but internal reporting is not required to be considered for an award.  If you choose to report internally, but also report the information to us within 120 days of reporting it internally, then (i) we will consider your information to be reported to the SEC on the date you reported it internally, and (ii) if the company conducts an investigation based on your internal report and then reports the results to us, you will benefit from all the information the Company’s investigation uncovers. Also, participation in your internal compliance program may be considered in determining the appropriate award amount. Please visit the retaliation section for more information regarding your retaliation protections when reporting internally. See Rules 21F-4(b)(7) and 21F-4(c).


8. I provided information to the SEC before the enactment of Dodd-Frank on July 21, 2010. Am I eligible for an award? 

Awards are available only in connection with information submitted to the SEC after July 21, 2010. See Rule 21F-4(b)(1).


9. How do I submit information under the SEC whistleblower program?

In order to be considered for an award under the whistleblower program, you must submit your information either through our online Tips, Complaints and Referrals questionnaire and answer “yes” to the questions regarding participating in the whistleblower program or by completing our hardcopy Form-TCR and mailing or faxing it to the SEC Office of the Whistleblower, 100 F Street NE, Mail Stop 5631, Washington, DC 20549, Fax (703) 813-9322. In addition, you must personally execute the declarations under penalty of perjury on these forms in the sections provided. See Rule 21F-9. Per the new rule amendments, you must submit a Form TCR to the Commission within 30 days of submitting your information or, if later, within 30 days of learning of the Form TCR filing requirement.  You are on constructive notice of the Form TCR filing requirement if you are represented by counsel.  If you do not timely submit your information on Form TCR, you may be ineligible for an award.  See Rule Amendment FAQ 10. 

OWB encourages all individuals to submit their whistleblower tips and any additional information electronically through the Commission’s on-line portal.  In January 2018, the Commission released an updated, more user-friendly version of the TCR System.   There are several benefits of using the on-line portal, including the fact that individuals receive an immediate acknowledgement of their submission along with a confirmation number.  The tip is automatically populated in a queue for staff who triage tips and complaints.  Those individuals who do not have ready access to a computer may submit hard-copy Form TCRs.  For those who submit a hard-copy Form TCR by mail or fax, you should maintain a copy of all documents and materials that you submit in connection with your whistleblower tip, including a mail receipt or fax confirmation.

After submitting an initial tip, a whistleblower is free to submit additional information or materials.  Additional information may be submitted through the on-line portal, with reference to the original TCR submission number, or may be submitted directly to the investigative staff if the whistleblower is working with Enforcement staff on the matter.  Those individuals who do not have ready access to a computer should submit additional information through mail or fax.  To the extent additional information is sent to OWB in hard-copy by mail or fax, OWB uploads the additional information into the TCR System.  Due to the increasing volume of additional information submitted in paper form to OWB, and the ready availability of electronic submissions, OWB no longer sends acknowledgement letters in response to whistleblower tips and additional information.  To the extent individuals want written confirmation of receipt of their whistleblower tip or additional information, they should make their submission through the on-line portal, noting the original TCR number if possible, and they will automatically receive confirmation of their submission online. 

Please send your submission using only one method of transmission.  Submitting information in multiple ways (e.g., via fax and mail) causes confusion and delay in the processing of the information.


10. Can I submit my information anonymously? 

Yes, you may submit anonymously. To be eligible for an award you must have an attorney represent you in connection with your submission. Your attorney must submit your information on your behalf either through our online Tips, Complaints and Referrals questionnaire, or by submitting hard copy Form TCR, in either case completing the required attorney certification.  In addition, you must provide the attorney with a completed hard copy Form TCR signed under penalty of perjury at the time of your anonymous submission. See Rule 21F-9.


11. Will the SEC keep my identity confidential?

Whether or not you seek anonymity, the SEC is committed to protecting your identity to the fullest extent possible. For example, we will not disclose your identity in response to requests under the Freedom of Information Act. However, there are limits on our ability to shield your identity and in certain circumstances we must disclose it to outside persons or entities. For example, in an administrative or court proceeding, we may be required to produce documents or other information which would reveal your identity as a whistleblower. In addition, as part of our ongoing investigatory responsibilities, we may use information you have provided during the course of our investigation. In appropriate circumstances, we may also provide information, subject to confidentiality requirements, to other governmental or regulatory entities.  See Rule 21F-7.


12. What happens to my tip once it is received by the SEC?

All tips, complaints and referrals received by the SEC are fully reviewed by our Enforcement staff. During the evaluation process, the Office of Market Intelligence (“OMI”) staff examines each tip to identify those with high-quality information that warrant the additional allocation of SEC resources. When OMI determines a complaint warrants deeper investigation, OMI staff assigns the complaint to one of the SEC’s eleven regional offices, a specialty unit, or to an Enforcement group in the Home Office. Complaints that relate to an existing investigation are forwarded to the staff working on the matter. Tips that could benefit from the specific expertise of another Division or Office within the SEC generally are forwarded to staff in that Division or Office for further analysis.

The SEC may use information from whistleblower tips and complaints in several different ways. For example, the SEC may initiate an enforcement investigation based on the whistleblower’s tip. A whistleblower tip may also prompt the SEC to commence an examination of a regulated entity or a review of securities filings, which may lead to an enforcement action. Even if the tip does not cause an investigation to be opened, it may still help lead to a successful enforcement action if the whistleblower provides additional information that significantly contributes to an ongoing or active investigation.

The SEC conducts its investigations on a confidential basis as a matter of policy. The purpose of this policy is to protect the integrity of any investigation from premature disclosure and to protect the privacy of persons involved in our investigations. The SEC generally does not comment on whether it has opened an investigation in a particular matter or the status of its investigations. While this can be frustrating, it is necessary to protect the integrity of the investigative process.


13. How will I learn about the opportunity to apply for an award?

We will post on this website Notices of Covered Action (“NoCA”) exceeding $1 million in sanctions so that anyone who believes they may be eligible will have an opportunity to apply for a whistleblower award. In addition, if staff has been working with you, or if you inquired regarding a posting, we may contact you or your attorney directly to alert you to the opportunity to apply for an award. However, OWB contacting you or your attorney does not mean we have made any determination regarding your eligibility for an award.  Additionally, the responsibility to apply for an award before the deadline passes lies solely with the whistleblower. See Rule 21F-10.

OWB sends email alerts to GovDelivery when the NoCA listing is updated.  Whistleblowers and other members of the public may sign up to receive an update via email every time the list of NoCAs on OWB’s website is updated. OWB typically posts new NoCAs on its website at the end of each month.


14. How do I apply for an award?

Once the case you believe your information led to is posted, you must complete and return Form WB-APP within 90 calendar days to the Office of the Whistleblower via mail to 100 F Street, NE, Mail Stop 5631, Washington DC 20549, or by fax (703) 813-9322. See Rule 21F-10.

We urge you to carefully consider whether your tip included the same allegations and parties as the action for which you are applying.  In September 2020, the Commission adopted rule amendments pursuant to which the Commission may bar an individual from participating in the whistleblower program if they submit three or more frivolous tips.  See Rule 21F-8(e) and Rule Amendment FAQ 12. 

Section D of Form WB-APP requires that you provide the case name and notice number for the Covered Action for which you seek an award. If you do not identify a covered action, your application may be considered deficient and you may not be considered for an award. OWB acknowledges receipt of Form WB-APPs by letter. We will notify you when the Claims Review Staff issues a preliminary determination with respect to your award claim.  See Rule 21F-10(d). OWBWB will not be able to give you status updates on your pending application for award. For more information about the claim review process please see Office of the Whistleblower Approach to Processing Whistleblower Award Claims.

15. How can I apply for an award in connection with a related action?

Individuals who provide information that leads to successful SEC actions resulting in monetary sanctions over $1 million may also be eligible to receive an award if the same information led to a related action brought by certain other authorities, such as a parallel criminal prosecution. You must complete and return Form WB-APP to the Office of the Whistleblower via mail to 100 F Street, NE, Mail Stop 5631, Washington DC 20549, or by fax (703) 813-9322. OWB acknowledges receipt of Form WB-APPs by letter.

If a final order imposing monetary sanctions has been entered in a related action at the time you submit your claim for an award in connection with SEC’s action, you must submit your claim for an award in that related action on the same Form WB-APP that you use for the SEC action.  If a final order imposing monetary sanctions in a related action has not been entered at the time you submit your claim for an award in connection with a SEC action, you must submit your claim on Form WB-APP within 90 calendar days of the issuance of a final order imposing sanctions in the related action. See Rule 21F-11.

Please note that under the new whistleblower rule amendments, Deferred Prosecution Agreements and Non-Prosecution Agreements entered into by the U.S. Department of Justice may be considered a related action for award purposes.  See Rule Amendment FAQs 16-18. Please also note that under the new whistleblower rule amendments, if another authority has a whistleblower award program, then the SEC will not consider the authority’s action to be a “related action” unless the SEC finds that the SEC’s own whistleblower program has a more direct and relevant connection to the action.  


16. What factors does the SEC consider in determining the amount of the award?

Under new Rule 21F-6(c), there is a 30% presumption if the award amount is $5 million or less and there are no negative factors (e.g., culpability, unreasonable reporting delay, and interference with an internal compliance system).  This presumption may be overcome if the whistleblower provided limited assistance or if a maximum award would be contrary to investor protection.  For more information on the 30% presumption, see Rule Amendment FAQ 2. 

If the award amount is over $5 million, the Commission will consider the following factors in determining the amount of an award based on the facts and circumstances of each case.

We may increase the award percentage based on the existence of these factors: 

  • The significance of the information you provided us to the success of any proceeding brought against wrongdoers. 
  • The extent of the assistance you provide us in our investigation and any successful proceeding. 
  • Our law enforcement interest in deterring violations of the securities laws by making awards to whistleblowers who provide information that leads to the successful enforcement of these laws. 
  • Whether, and the extent to which, you participated in your company's internal compliance systems, such as, for example, reporting the possible securities violations through internal whistleblower, legal or compliance procedures before, or at the same time, you reported them to us.

We may reduce the amount of an award based on these factors:

  • If you were a participant in, or culpable for the securities law violation(s) you reported. 
  • If you unreasonably delayed reporting the violation(s) to us. 
  • If you interfered with your company's internal compliance and reporting systems, such as, for example, making false statements to your compliance department that hindered its efforts to investigate possible wrongdoing. See Rule 21F-6.

17. Can I appeal the SEC's award decision?

You have two opportunities to appeal the award determination.  First, OWB will notify you of the preliminary determination of the SEC’s claims review staff to recommend that the SEC either grant or deny your award application, and if granted, the percentage amount of your award.   You may request reconsideration of this preliminary determination by submitting your response to OWB within 60 days of the later of (i) the issuance of the preliminary determination or (ii) your receipt of the record that was relied upon in making the preliminary determination, if you requested the record within 30 days of the issuance of the preliminary determination. See Rule 21F-10. Please note there are shorter time periods if your claim was subject to the Preliminary Summary Disposition Process established by new Rule 21F-18.  See Rule Amendment FAQ 14. 

The claims review staff will consider your response and forward its proposed final determination to the Commission.  If the Commission denies your application for an award, you may file an appeal in an appropriate United States Court of Appeals within 30 days of the Commission’s final decision being issued. See Rule 21F-13. However, if you are granted an award and the Commission follows the factors described above and the total amount awarded is between 10% and 30% of the monetary sanctions collected in the action, then the Commission’s decision is not appealable.


18. What rights do I have if my employer retaliates against me for submitting information to the SEC? 

Employers may not discharge, demote, suspend, harass, or in any way discriminate against you because of any lawful act done by you in, among other things, (i) providing information to us under the whistleblower program, or (ii) assisting us in any investigation or proceeding based on the information submitted. If you believe that your employer has wrongfully retaliated against you, you may report your concerns to the SEC and we may, in appropriate circumstances, bring an enforcement action against a company.

You can find more information about the Dodd-Frank whistleblower protections, including the time period by which a whistleblower must file a private action in federal court, in Section 922 of the Dodd-Frank Act.

Also, under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, you may be entitled to file a complaint with the U.S. Department of Labor if you are retaliated against for reporting possible securities law violations. For more details on filing whistleblower complaints under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, please visit the Department of Labor's whistleblower website.

For more information about retaliation, please see the retaliation section of the website.


19. If I have more questions, who can I call?

To help promote the agency’s whistleblower program and establish a line of communication with the public, OWB operates a whistleblower hotline where whistleblowers, or would-be whistleblowers, their attorneys, or other members of the public with questions about the program may call. Individuals leave messages on the hotline, which are returned by OWB attorneys within 24 business hours. To protect the identity of whistleblowers, OWB will not leave return messages unless the caller’s name is clearly and fully identified on the caller’s voicemail message, or unless the caller gives their permission for us to leave a message. If OWB is unable to leave a message because the individual’s name is not identified or if it appears to be a shared voicemail system, OWB attorneys make two additional attempts to contact the individual.

If you would like to speak to an attorney in the Office please call 202-551-4790 and provide your TCR submission number (if you have one) when you leave a message.

Share:
Read More

Dorian Daley

Pete BennettJanuary 06, 2022Attorney License Profile, Oracle America Inc., Oracle America Inc. v. Google Inc., Oracle Cases and Attorneys, Oracle Corporation No comments

Attorney Profile

Dorian Estelle Daley #129049

License Status: Active

Address: Oracle Corp, Mail Stop 5OP784, 500 Oracle Pkwy, Redwood City, CA 94065

Phone: 650-506-5500  |  Fax: 650-633-1813

Email: Not Available  |  Website: Not Available

  • More about This Attorney

License Status, Disciplinary and Administrative History

All changes of license status due to nondisciplinary administrative matters and disciplinary actions.

DateLicense Status Discipline Administrative Action 
PresentActive  
6/17/1987Admitted to the State Bar of California

Additional Information:

  • About the disciplinary system
Share:
Read More

Business Unit: Electric Engineering | Transmission & Substation Engineering group

Pete BennettJanuary 06, 2022Electric Engineering, Jobs, PG&E No comments

Requisition ID # 120500 

Job Category : Engineering / Science; Information Technology; Maintenance / Construction / Operations 

Job Level : Individual Contributor

Business Unit: Electric Engineering

Technology & Tools Team Overview

Our team within Pacific Gas & Electric Company supports the Transmission & Substation Engineering groups that are designing and building safer more reliable electrical networks.  Our team is currently in the process of implementing intelligent engineering tools that will automate work processes, enhance user experiences, while achieving our project goals.  We are seeking an experienced engineering professional to join our team to help support the Transmission and Substation engineering line of business.  As a member of our team, you will be setting the direction for innovation in design and engineering technologies at PG&E.   

Position Summary

The Business Systems Specialist, Expert will focus on technology and tools, such as, OpenUtilities Substation, ProjectWise, PLS CADD and Grid Search.  Your participation will enable PG&E Transmission and Substation engineering teams to improve capabilities such as 3D design, bill of material generation, project estimations and GIS integrations. We are seeking a knowledgeable engineering resource who is experienced with implementing new technology in a utility environment. Our new team member will be required to implement change thru collaborative decision making.  The expert position requires excellent organizational, communication and business analysis skills.  The position also requires the ability to identify user requirements, correlate them to vendor capabilities, and reach consensus of the engineering community on the technology and tools to influence business processes.   

Job Responsibilities

In this role you will support engineering and design technology for both Transmission Line and Substation engineering groups.  The tools being used are intelligent 3D modeling tools that are integrated with PG&E enterprise systems, such as, SAP and ESRI.  Setting up and configuring the tools will provide you with the knowledge to answer service request tickets while you help develop the road map for continued design excellence.  The successful candidate will:

  • Maintain and develop the Remedy Service Ticketing system for all technology & tools used by both Transmission and Substation engineering groups.
  • Influence and develop engineering workflows for both Transmission and Substation engineering groups that will use our intelligent design applications
  • Create a knowledge base for frequently asked questions on how to develop the design and job package to complete engineering projects
  • Lead various end user engagements, such as, user group meetings, Microsoft Teams chat discussion groups, and solution training events
  • Participate in gathering PG&E’s business requirements for both Transmission and Substation engineering groups and apply technology to provide solutions.
  • Test new technologies and upgrades to existing tools.
  • Act as a lead liaison and collaborate with software vendors, system integrators, and PG&E IT, as a PG&E business Subject Matter Experts (SME) for T-Line engineering.
  • Champion process efficiency and effective change management
  • Maintain in-depth knowledge of the product and solutions and provide direction and input on PGE technology roadmap.
  • Manage multiple clients to ensure critical needs are met quickly and efficiently including vendors and consultants; manage time appropriately in a time-sensitive operations environment.  Position will be considered a key contact for PLS CADD, Grid Search, and ProjectWise.

Qualifications

Minimum:

  • BBA/BS in Business, Engineering, Computer Science/Information Systems, etc. or equivalent work experience
  • 7 years in business systems analysis or related

Desired:

  • 5+ years Electric utility background (distribution or transmission operations preferred)
  • Project Management Experience
  • Demonstrated experience in functional designs, user stories, and training documents, deployments, vendor and defect management.
  • Demonstrates strong understanding of the impact(s) of technology changes to the collective business processes across multiple business units.
  • Demonstrated self-starter with experience working in complex environments charting a path to successful delivery and operations
  • Strong interpersonal, verbal, and written communication skills with the ability to work in a collaborative environment and interact with all levels of management within the Business and IT departments.
  • Strong technical acumen with the ability to understand business system and software deployment. 
  • Ability to lead all aspects of a functional workstream including engaging stakeholders, driving consensus and design decisions, ensuring alignment with the overall portfolio and execution timelines.
  • Awareness and familiarity with tools / applications regularly used by electric transmission engineer such as: PLS CADD, Grid Search, SAP, ProjectWise.
  • Experience building, testing, and maintaining mission critical systems within the context of utility operations.
  • Strong drive for results and continuous improvement including development of standards and process in line with utility best practices.
  • Ability to create core and supplemental materials such as scope and requirements documents, test plans, design documents, training documents, etc.
  • Test lead or test management experience; Experience in executing functional and user acceptance testing (UAT) with specific experience in developing, documenting, and executing scenario-based testing scripts for UAT.
  • Foster a work environment in which individuals collaborate in pursuit of a common mission and mutual goals.
  • Demonstrated skills and experience with MS Professional Office Suite (Excel, Access, Word, Visio)
Share:
Read More

Pieces of the puzzle for you to assemble

Pete BennettJanuary 06, 2022Dead Attorneys No comments

The Billionaire Puzzle

PGEwitness.com and GasPipelineexplosions.blogspot.com started long before the Town of Paradise burned down. Pete Bennett founder of a series of sites life has been destroyed, his family, his friends, his clients coupled with the immeasurable loss of life.

During August 2004, Pete Bennett went through a series of disturbing incidents of assault, attempted murder, arson, vehicle but on top of unusual medical.


Marc Angelucci
Marc Angelucci (March 30, 1968 – July 11, 2020) was an American attorney, men's rights activist, and
Oklahoma City Bombing
Oklahoma City Official Trailer 1 (2017) - ,
Missing Person
Missing Juvenile: Lisa Dickinson Missing Since: 09/05/76 Date of Birth: 04/25/67 Age: 9 years old Height and weight: 4’10” 80 lbs
Louis Richard Fresquez
Louis Richard Fresquez
John Makin
Attorney created insurance forms for the Terrorism Insurance behind Lloyds of London Beazely Group
Kevin Lally
Attorney from Contra Costa County linked to Kinder Morgan, Southern Pacific
Cromwell Uranium Holdings Inc.
Cromwell Uranium Corp. Completes Acquisition of Cromwell Uranium Holdings Inc.
Kevin Lally
The career of Mr.Lally crosses back to hearings in a Contra Costa County Superior Court between 1987 to 1990. .
Scott Peterson is Innocent
Scott Peterson


Share:
Read More

The Insider Terrorists Meeting - their data your life

Pete BennettJanuary 06, 2022 No comments

The Insider Terrorists Meeting


Deliver of the Maps during PG&E Meeting

Placed via external drive provided by PG& Pete Bennett's laptop by Ravenel Enterprises SVP Paul Reddit. Meeting Location: 

Pacific Gas & Electric Company 
Address: 1850 Gateway Blvd Fl 6, 
Concord, CA 94520 
Phone: (800) 743-5000

California Data Breach and Microsoft Sharepoint

Example map of over 20,000 internal documents directly from the SharePoint Server.





Share:
Read More

California Software Company Executives Charged In Conspiracy To Defraud The Tennessee Valley Authority

Pete BennettJanuary 06, 2022Computer Espionage, Department of Justice, Energy Consultants, Energy Terrorism No comments
U.S. Attorneys » Middle District of Tennessee » News
SHARE
Department of Justice
U.S. Attorney’s Office
Middle District of Tennessee

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Monday, September 13, 2021

California Software Company Executives Charged In Conspiracy To Defraud The Tennessee Valley Authority

Company Allegedly Sought More Than $300,000 in Fraudulent Incentive Payments from TVA Through Software Installation in Rutherford County Schools

NASHVILLE – A seven-count indictment unsealed Friday charged two Danville, California men with conspiracy to defraud the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) of more than $300,000, announced Acting U.S. Attorney Mary Jane Stewart for the Middle District of Tennessee. 

Anthony Gigliotti, 74, the CEO of Autonomic Software, Inc., (Autonomic) was charged with conspiracy to commit wire fraud, three counts of mail fraud, and three counts of wire fraud.  Alexander Gigliotti, 36, the Vice President of Autonomic, was charged with conspiracy to commit wire fraud.  Both were arrested by U.S. Marshals in Danville, California on Friday and will appear in the Middle District of Tennessee at a later date for further proceedings. 

According to the indictment, Autonomic was a software company located in Danville, California, which provided a variety of software to private and public sector organizations.  In 2016, Autonomic installed power management software in Rutherford County school systems, in connection with TVA’s EnergyRight program, an incentive-based program designed to save energy and reduce costs through the installation of energy-saving software.  To be eligible for the energy conservation funds, customers were required to pay a portion of the software materials costs.

Instead of following the program requirements, Autonomic represented to the Rutherford County School District that schools would not incur any costs associated with the software installation.  Following the installation of the software, Autonomic submitted 47 invoices, totaling $588,240 to Lockheed Martin, the contract administrator of the EnergyRight program.  The invoices were made out to Rutherford County Schools and represented that each school incurred costs associated with Autonomic’s software installation.

Alexander Gigliotti also sent an email to a Lockheed Martin representative in support of seeking the incentive payments from TVA, with a breakdown of an invoice regarding purported costs incurred by Rutherford County Schools, claiming that the school paid $22 per computer related to software and $8 per computer related to support.  In fact, Rutherford County Schools did not incur any costs associated with any invoice from Autonomic.  Lockheed Martin then mailed incentive payments to Autonomic that corresponded to each invoice.

The Autonomic software failed to function as initially represented and approximately one year after the installation, Rutherford County Schools purchased energy saving software that could effectively quantify energy savings and which cost substantially less than Autonomic’s total purported materials costs.

The indictment also alleges that Anthony Gigliotti lied to TVA agents by falsely stating that Alexander Gigliotti was not involved in any of the previous TVA or school system work. 

If convicted, the defendants face up to 20 years in prison.

This case was investigated by the TVA Office of Inspector General and is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Sara Beth Myers.

An indictment is merely an accusation.  The defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. 

# # # # #

 

Topic(s): 
Financial Fraud
Component(s): 
USAO - Tennessee, Middle
Contact: 
David Boling Public Affairs Officer 615-736-5956 david.boling2@usdoj.gov
Share:
Read More
← Newer Posts Older Posts → Home
  • Popular
  • Tags
  • Blog Archives

Popular Posts

  • Governor Newsom Announces Appointments 12.1.20
    Governor Newsom Announces Appointments 12.1.20 Published:  Dec 01, 2020 SACRAMENTO – Governor Gavin Newsom today announced the fol...
  • Model Rules of Professional Conduct: Preamble & Scope
      Model Rules of Professional Conduct: Preamble & Scope Share:         PREAMBLE:  A LAWYER'S RESPONSIBILITIES [1] A lawyer, as a mem...
  • PG&E board must be ousted amid wildfire woes: big investor
    PG&E board must be ousted amid wildfire woes: big investor Big investor says entire PG&E must be fired after years of fatal disas...

Blog Archive

  • October (2)
  • August (1)
  • April (1)
  • March (3)
  • February (3)
  • January (50)
  • December (8)
  • November (1)
  • October (4)
  • November (1)
  • October (1)
  • August (1)
  • May (1)
  • February (4)
  • January (51)
  • December (74)
  • November (28)
  • May (2)
  • April (3)
  • March (2)
  • February (1)

Ad Home

More Links

Follow Us

No one has ever become poor by giving, Please Donate

Flickr Images

Featured

javascript:void(0)
Powered by Blogger.

Comments

Facebook

Report Abuse

Search This Blog

Find Us On Facebook

Random Posts

Recent Posts

Header Ads

BlogRoll

Labels

  • ..a
  • 101 Ygnacio Valley Rd
  • Abuse of Authority Under Color of Law
  • Accenture
  • ADA Complaint
  • AEGIS
  • Alliant Insurance Services Inc
  • Antitrust Division Manual
  • Arson
  • Articles
  • AT&T
  • AT&T Data Breach
  • Attorney General of the United States.
  • Attorney License Profile
  • Attorneys
  • Azerbaijan
  • Banking
  • Bankruptcy
  • Bechtel Corporation
  • Bechtel Petroleum
  • Bennett Incidents
  • Bennett v. Southern Pacific
  • Big Law
  • bin Laden Group
  • Blackhawk Network Holdings Inc
  • Bonds
  • Building 7
  • Burlington-Northern Railroad Co
  • California Attorney General
  • California Economy
  • california sniper
  • California Terrorism
  • California Wildfires
  • Camp Stoneman
  • CampFire Sniper
  • CASE HISTORY of BENNETT
  • Case Tracker
  • CCCDA
  • CCCDA.
  • CEO Randall Stephenson
  • Chicago and Northwestern Inc.
  • City of Concord
  • City of Pittsburg
  • City of San Bruno
  • City of Walnut Creek
  • Civil Rights
  • Civil Rights Division
  • Cloud Storage
  • Computer Espionage
  • Computer Viruses
  • Connecting Pete Bennett
  • Consulting Partners. Pete Bennett Consulting
  • Contra Costa Bar Association
  • Contra Costa County Cities
  • Contra Costa County District Attorney
  • Contra Costa Grand Jury
  • Contractors
  • Counterintelligence
  • County of Butte
  • County of Solano
  • Court House News
  • Court Ordered Probation
  • CPUC
  • CPUC Employee
  • Cyber Crime
  • Cybersecurity
  • Darby MT
  • Daryl Cherney
  • Data Breach
  • Data Breaches
  • Dead Attorneys
  • Dead Witness
  • Department of Homeland Security
  • Department of Justice
  • Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein
  • DHS
  • Director James Comey
  • Director Robert Mueller
  • Disability Rights Section
  • Domestic Terrorism
  • Economic Terrorism
  • Electric Engineering
  • Ellen O. Tauscher
  • Energy Consultants
  • Energy Sector
  • Energy Terrorism
  • Enhanced Oversight and Enforcement
  • ENRON
  • Espionage-Chinese
  • Ethics and Compliance
  • Event Tracker
  • Explosion
  • Explosions
  • FAIR ISSAC
  • FBI
  • FBI Agent Frank Doyle Jr.
  • FBI Special Agent in Charge
  • Federal Cases
  • Federal Court Monitor
  • Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
  • Felony Assault
  • FERC
  • FICO
  • Fire Safety
  • Fire Victims Trust. Bankruptcy Fraud
  • Flight 93
  • Former PG&E Programmer Speaks
  • former Soviet Republics
  • Fremont Group
  • G4S
  • Gas Operations
  • GAS PIPELINE EXPLOSION CASES
  • George Schultz
  • GTE Sprint Communications
  • H-1b Visa
  • Hate Crimes
  • Henley Hall
  • High Performance Engineer
  • Hillary Clinton
  • Howard V. Golub
  • Immigration
  • Incident
  • Incident List
  • Independent Safety Monitor
  • Insider Terrorism
  • IRS Criminal Investigation Division
  • Jobs
  • Judge Alsup
  • Judge Joel Golub
  • Judge Peter Spinetta
  • Judi Bari
  • Kansas City Southern
  • Kazakhstan
  • Ken Salaza
  • Keystone XL Pipeline
  • Kidnapping
  • Kinder Morgan
  • Kirkland & Ellis
  • KKR Financial Holdings LLC
  • Larry Ellison
  • Law Enforcement Profiles
  • Law Firms
  • Law360
  • Lawrence Investments
  • Letters to PG&E
  • LGBT
  • Linear Terrorism
  • Malware
  • Maps
  • Maps. Pleasant Hill
  • Mark Peterson
  • Mayor Newsom
  • Media
  • Meyers Nave
  • Michael Peevey
  • multistage intrusion campaign
  • Munger Hall
  • NIMDA
  • NIMDA. Computer Viruses
  • NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
  • Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region IV
  • Obituaries
  • Obstruction of Justice
  • Office of the Governor of the State of California
  • Oracle
  • Oracle America Inc.
  • Oracle America Inc. v. Google Inc.
  • Oracle Cases and Attorneys
  • Oracle Corporation
  • Orange County
  • Organized Crime
  • Paul Reddit
  • Pavel Ivanovich Lazarenko
  • Pete Bennett
  • PETER C
  • PG&E
  • PG&E #CampFire
  • PG&E Attorneys
  • PG&E Bankruptcy
  • PG&E Board of Directors
  • PG&E Consultant
  • PG&E Contempt of Court
  • PG&E Corporate
  • PG&E Coverup Facts
  • PG&E Data Breach
  • PG&E Employee Murders
  • PG&E Ethics Program
  • PG&E External Communications
  • PG&E Federal Indictments
  • PG&E Incidents
  • PG&E Investors
  • PG&E Kidnapping
  • PG&E Legislation
  • PG&E Lies and Omissions
  • PG&E Maps
  • PG&E Media Relations
  • PG&E Metcalf Station
  • PG&E Murders
  • PG&E News
  • PG&E Rewards
  • PG&E San Bruno
  • PG&E Senior Executives
  • PG&E Shareholders
  • PG&E Sniper Attack
  • PG&E SVP
  • PG&E Terrorism
  • PG&E Witness
  • Philip Anschutz
  • PIMCO
  • Pipeline Explosions
  • Pipelines
  • Powder River Basin
  • President Obama
  • Public Corruption
  • Public Utilities Commission
  • Railroad Litigation
  • Ransomware
  • Rating Agencies
  • RAVENEL ENTERPRISES INC
  • Retail
  • Reward
  • Robert LaLonde
  • Russia
  • Safeway Murders
  • San Bruno Victims
  • San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS)
  • Santa Fe Pacific Corporation
  • Santa Fe Pacific Pipeline Partners LP
  • Santa Fe Pacific Pipelines Inc
  • Santa Fe Southern Pacific
  • SBC Global
  • SEC
  • Secretary of State
  • Security Leadership and Management
  • sfgate.com
  • Sniper Terrorism
  • Southern Pacific
  • Southern Pacific Communications Corporation
  • Southern Pacific Railroad
  • Special Agent Ken Karch
  • Special Agent Kenneth Karch
  • Sprint Corporation
  • SQL Server
  • SQL Tuning
  • State Bar of California
  • Supervisor Candace Andersen
  • T-Mobile
  • Target
  • Target Data Breach
  • Telecom Terrorism
  • Terrorism
  • Texas Eastern Corp
  • The Consultants
  • The Energy Murders
  • The Honorable Ellen O. Tauscher
  • The Matter of Bennett vs. Southern Pacific
  • The PG&E Consultant
  • The PG&E Letter.
  • The San Bruno Bomber
  • The Sniper Files
  • The Virus Files
  • Theranos
  • TO
  • Turkmenistan
  • U.S. Attorney
  • U.S. Attorney Hartley West
  • U.S. Attorney’s Office
  • UC Berkeley
  • UC Regents
  • UC Santa Barbara
  • UC System
  • Ukraine
  • Union Pacific Corp.
  • US Attorney Mueller
  • US DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
  • USDOJ
  • Utility Terrorism
  • Verdicts & Settlements
  • Victims of Pipeline Explosions
  • Video
  • Vinson and Elkins
  • Violent Crime
  • W
  • Wall Street
  • Walnut Creak
  • Walnut Creek Bomb Squad
  • Walnut Creek Car Bomb
  • Walnut Creek Library
  • Walnut Creek Police
  • Walnut Creek Police Department
  • Wharton School
  • Whistleblower
  • White-Collar Crime
  • Wildfire Terrorism
  • WilmerHale
  • Witness Intimidation
  • WMD

Blog Archive

  • ▼ 2022 (60)
    • ▼ October (2)
      • San Bruno Fire Caused by Gas Line 421,565 views Se...
      • Governor Newsom Announces Appointments 12.1.20
    • ► August (1)
    • ► April (1)
    • ► March (3)
    • ► February (3)
    • ► January (50)
  • ► 2021 (13)
    • ► December (8)
    • ► November (1)
    • ► October (4)
  • ► 2020 (2)
    • ► November (1)
    • ► October (1)
  • ► 2019 (57)
    • ► August (1)
    • ► May (1)
    • ► February (4)
    • ► January (51)
  • ► 2018 (110)
    • ► December (74)
    • ► November (28)
    • ► May (2)
    • ► April (3)
    • ► March (2)
    • ► February (1)

Labels

Popular Posts

  • Governor Newsom Announces Appointments 12.1.20
    Governor Newsom Announces Appointments 12.1.20 Published:  Dec 01, 2020 SACRAMENTO – Governor Gavin Newsom today announced the fol...
  • Model Rules of Professional Conduct: Preamble & Scope
      Model Rules of Professional Conduct: Preamble & Scope Share:         PREAMBLE:  A LAWYER'S RESPONSIBILITIES [1] A lawyer, as a mem...
  • PG&E board must be ousted amid wildfire woes: big investor
    PG&E board must be ousted amid wildfire woes: big investor Big investor says entire PG&E must be fired after years of fatal disas...
  • PG&E Emerges from Chapter 11
    PG&E Emerges from Chapter 11 SEPTEMBER 25, 2020 On July 1, 2020, PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas & Electric Company (...
  • San Bruno Fire Caused by Gas Line 421,565 views Sep 10, 2010
  • PG&E Vendor Federal Indictments with near complete access and to Windows Servers
    CRITICAL PG&E VENDOR  INFRASTRUCTURE INDICTED  Would somebody tell the Honorable JudgeAlsup.com as Federal Court Monitor ...
  • Unpaid PG&E Programmer, Federal Witness, Jailed, Beaten , Family and Officers Murdered and c p
    Hire Then The Programmer Pete Bennett hired to work for PG&E SubContractor nearly beaten to death assets, customers,...
  • US agencies: Industrial control system malware discovered - When the lights go out
      US agencies: Industrial control system malware discovered Multiple U.S. government agencies have issued a joint alert announcing...
  • Open Letter To PG&E Vice President Brian Cherry
    Cherry Ravenel Letter to PG&E, FBI, CPUC, SAG and Walnut Creek ...
  • Business Unit: Electric Engineering | Transmission & Substation Engineering group
    Requisition ID # 120500  Job Category : Engineering / Science; Information Technology; Maintenance / Construction / Operations  Jo...

Recent Posts

Unordered List

  • Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit.
  • Aliquam tincidunt mauris eu risus.
  • Vestibulum auctor dapibus neque.

Pages

Theme Support

Need our help to upload or customize this blogger template? Contact me with details about the theme customization you need.
  • Loading...
  • Loading...
  • Short Message

    Coming Soon

    Social